72 years . Baptised as an infant. Catholic ancestors go back to Goa. Urban hermit. Discoverer of The Rational Premise and VC2 rational and irrational. Break for trads.Discovered late in life that with LG 16 visible we get the New Theology and with LG 16 invisible we return to the Scholastic theology on EENS etc.
March 17. St. Patrick. Baptised at St. Patrick's Cathedral. Studied at St. Patrick's School,Graduated from St. Patrick's College, Karachi. Irish missionaries!
Eldest son of Luke and Maggie Andrades.Completed semesters in theology , with exams and credit points, at the National Catholic Institute of Theology, Karachi.
Studied Philosophy at the University Pontificia Regina Apostoloum, Rome. Final semester left. Also attended corses in Theology and Latin.
Seminarian at the Pontificial Maria Mater Ecclesia seminary ( 2002) of the Legion of Christ and the English Beda Pontifical College ( seminary) Rome ( 2023).
Holder of the All Pakistan Newspaper Society (APNS) Best Reporter of the Year Award presented at an event for journalists, in Karachi, by Benazir Bhutto.
SEDEVACANTISM BASED UPON VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL IS NOW OBSOLETE. THE COUNCIL CAN BE INTERPRETED RATIONALLY AND THE CONCUSION IS ECCLESIOCENTRIC AND TRADITIONAL.
Catholic lay man in Rome. Discoverer of Feeneyism versus Cushingism, the Rational Interpretation of Vatican Council II, a breakthrough for the present Catholic Church.The sedevacantists reject the pope because of Vatican Council II irrational. When the Council is rational it supports Tradition. There is no reason for them to reject the Council or the pope. Even the SSPX can now accept Vatican Council II , rational, and meet the demand that they accept the Council. The Council is in harmony with Tradition. So they can ask for canonical recognition. They can also demand that Pope Leo XIV interpret Vatican Council II rationally, since this is ethical and that he also accept Tradition, as did Pope Leo XIII. The main line Catholic Church must now be traditional since the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms can only be interpreted rationally and the conclusion is traditional.
16.10.2026
GENERAL AGREEMENT IN CHURCH DOCTRINE IN BOSTON AND NEW HAMPSHIRE
FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE AND THE JUDGE IN THE MICHAEL VORIS CASE STILL INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II UNETHICALLY IN NEW HAMPSHIRE - 5
Bishop Peter Libasci, Fr. Georges de Laire, Michael Voris, Brother Andre Marie micm, the CMRI in NH- everyone agrees that LG 8, 14, 16, etc refer to hypothetical cases and so are not practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence 1442 as held by the St. Benedict Center in NH. They also agree that Vatican Council II can be interpreted with LG 14 and LG 16 referring to invisible cases in 2026. So the baptism of desire and being saved are always invisible cases and examples of known cases of non Catholics saved outside the Catholic Church in the present times.
So Vatican Council II is ecclesiocentric with Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) and is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus as held by the Slaves of the …More
THE SSPX SECOND APPEAL AGAINST THE EXCOMMUNICATION ALSO WRONGLY ASSUMES THAT VATICAN COUNCIL II IS IRRATIONAL AND NOT RATIONAL
THE FERNANDEZ-PAGLIARANI TALKS WERE BASED UPON VATICAN COUNCIL II IRRATIONAL AND NOT RATIONAL. SO THEY WERE A WASTE OF TIME LIKE THE SSPX -VATICAN DOCTRINAL TALKS DURING THE PONTIFICATE OF POPE BENEDICT.
15.10.2026 Feast of St. Teresa of Jesus
THE SSPX SECOND APPEAL AGAINST THE EXCOMMUNICATION ALSO WRONGLY ASSUMES THAT VATICAN COUNCIL II IS IRRATIONAL AND NOT RATIONAL
If Cardinal Sean O Malley used the Rational Premise then he becomes a traditionalist like Brother Andre Marie micm. The archdiocese becomes traditionalist once again.
FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE AND THE JUDGE IN THE MICHAEL VORIS CASE STILL INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II UNETHICALLY IN NEW HAMPSHIRE - 4
For Bishop Peter Libasci, Fr. Georges de Laire. Michael Voris , the CMRI in NH, Brother Andre Marie micm and archbishops Morandi and Di Noia, LG 8, 14, 16 etc, are invisible. They are hypothetical cases in …More
14.10.2026
Cardinal Sean O’Malley and the bishops in Boston interpret Vatican Council II etc dishonestly : People do not know about it.
FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE AND THE JUDGE IN THE MICHAEL VORIS CASE STILL INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II UNETHICALLY IN NEW HAMPSHIRE -3
Bishop Peter Libasci, would want doctrinal unity in the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA.
He has to follow the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican. Archbishops Giacomo Morandi and Augustine di Noia, like Pope Benedict put out what they call ‘ a nuanced interpretation’ of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS). I call it a Cushingite interpretation as opposed to the orthodox and rational Feeneyite interpretation of EENS.
DDF IRRATIONAL
The DDF is also Cushingite on Vatican Council II, the baptism of desire, the Nicene Creed, the Athanasius Creed and all the Catechisms and of course, the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston, which we now know can be interpreted rationally with …More
13.10.2026
THERE IS A BIG SHIFY IN THEOLOGY IN THE ARCHDIOCESE OF BOSTON
An injustice was done to Michael Voris and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary at the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire.
FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE AND THE JUDGE IN THE MICHAEL VORIS CASE STILL INTERPRET VC 2 UNETHICALLY IN NEW HAMPSHIRE -2
Vatican Council II is dogmatic and ecclesiocentric and is aligned with the extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire, USA and not the Diocese of Manchester in NH- and so, neither with Pope Leo XIV and the Vatican.
This is a big shift in theology in the Archdiocese of Boston, of which Manchester is a suffrage diocese.
Ad Gentes 7 ( all need faith and baptism for salvation) is aligned with the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus of the Council of Florence 1442, with hypothetical cases of LG 8,14,16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, not being practical exceptions for AG 7, EENS or CCC 846 ( Outside the Church No Salvation).
The Council is traditional. This …More
13.10.26 Monday Feast of Our Lady of Fatima
FR. GEORGES DE LAIRE AND THE JUDGE IN THE MICHAEL VORIS CASE STILL INTERPRET VC 2 UNETHICALLY IN NEW HAMPSHIRE
The diocese should compensate the religious community in NH and Michael Voris
A religious community in New Hampshire, USA accepts all Magisterial (Church Documents) Documents and interprets them rationally and so ethically. While the bishop of Manchester in NH also accepts all Creeds, Councils and Catechisms but interprets them irrationally, dishonestly and liberally. The bishop expects all Catholics in the diocese, lay organisations and religious communities to do the same.
The bishop, Peter Libasci, is supported by Pope Leo XIV and Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and Cardinal Blaise Cupich, who also interpret all Church Documents irrationally and so non traditionally. They then excommunicate those who do not do the same.
They want a liberal, new Catholic Church with Vatican Council II interpreted falsely.
A Decree of Precepts and …More
10.10.2026
TIME TO CHALLENGE CUSHINGITE EXCOMMUNICATIONS
The SSPX and the traditionalists have to affirm Vatican Council and all the Catechisms (Feeneyite), all the Creeds, (Feeneyite) and the 1949 Letter of the Holy Office, (Feeneyite and not Cushingite). The ‘red is not an exception for the blue’ in Vatican Council II etc, and the ‘blue passages’ dominate.
In this way they affirm Vatican Council II and also Tradition. Pope Leo cannot do the same. For Vatican Council II (Cushingite) is a rupture with EENS (Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed (Feeneyite), and the Nicene Creed (Feeneyite).
With Vatican Council II, Cushingite he is politically correct with the Left but he has to reject de fide teachings, which are Feeneyite. It is the same for the cardinals and bishops.But this is not the problem for the traditionalists.
So canonically, Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano could affirm Vatican Council II Feeneyite in harmony with Tradition (EENS, Feeneyite) but Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez …More
10.10.2026
THE TRADITIONALISTS AND CATHOLIC ANSWERS, EWTN CONFERENCES ARE NOT OUR ‘CATHOLIC IDENTITY’.
The traditionalists and Catholic Answers, EWTN annual conferences, are not our ‘Catholic Identity’. They are irrational on the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms and Vatican Council II.
When the speakers at the Catholic Identity Conference interpret Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church irrationally and schismatically, it is a modern heresy. It is an Americanist heresy which has brought schism into the Catholic Church. This is even among the Lefebvrists and the sedevacantists.
The 1949 Letter of the Holy Office to the Archbishop of Boston with reference to Fr. Leonard Feeney was heretical when it rejected the traditional interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. It suggested invisible cases of the baptism of desire were visible exceptions for Feeneyite EENS. This is Cushingism and not Feeneyism.
Similarly the interpretation of Vatican Council II was …More
LEGALLY THE EU CAN BE CORRECTED ON VATICAN COUNCIL II, IRRATIONAL.
Legally, why must Catholics accept the interpretation of Vatican Council II by the European Union, the Italian Government and the Vatican, with the Irrational Premise, False Inference and liberal and non traditional conclusion? We now have a rational, traditional and honest option.
Their Cushingism confuses what is invisible (LG 16 for example) as being physically visible in the present times and then they produce a liberal and non traditional conclusion. Instead with Feeneyism, which sees invisible cases as just being invisible, produces a traditional and rational conclusion. The Church returns to the old ecclesiology.
The list of baptism of desire cases, on the sedevacantist website CMRI, is interpreted with Cushingism. But that same list can be interpreted with Feeneyism and the conclusion would be traditional. The baptism of desire would no more be a practical exception for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus …More
08.10.2026
THE DECREE OF PROHIBITIONS ON THE SBC IN PRINCIPLE CONFUSES WHAT IS INVISIBLE AS BEING VISIBLE : THIS IS ILLEGAL IN NEW HAMPSHIRE?
The Decree of Prohibitions on the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire, USA confuses what is invisible as being visible, this is illegal in New Hampshire?
The Legislature and Mayor’s Office in New Hampshire, could confirm if LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to invisible or visible cases in 2026-2027.
The media refers to the St. Benedict Center in Richmond, NH, as ‘ a sect’ even though they affirm the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms and Vatican Council II, interpreted rationally and they accept Pope Leo as the pope. He interprets Magisterial Documents irrationally, like popes Benedict and Francis.
With Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally, Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez, the Prefect of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican and Bishop Peter Libasci, the …More
An SSPX-SBC Joint Statement is needed.Sedevacantists make an objective mistake on the baptism of desire
There is an objective mistake of the sedevacantists (CMRI, MHT etc) on ever the Catechism of Pope Pius IX (29 Q, Feeneyite or Cushingite?).
Pope Leo has still not informed the Church that LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II refer to theoretical, implicit and unknown cases in 2026. Theoretical cases cannot be practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) of the Council of Florence 1442. So EENS ( Feeneyite), the Athanasius Creed, Feeneyite, the Nicene Creed, Feeneyite, the Catechisms, Feeneyite and not Cushingite and the Creeds Feeneyite and not Cushingite, are apostolic, magisterial, rational and traditional.
1. The St.Benedict Center ,NH (SBC) and the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX) can agree that the baptism of desire and being saved in invincible ignorance refer to hypothetical and invisible cases in 2026.
2. So implicit and un known cases …More
Baptism of Blood and of Desire
HERE IS THE LIST OF BAPTISM OF DESIRE CASES MENTIONED ON THE CMRI WEBSITE. THEY ARE ALL HYPOTHETICAL CASES. THEY ARE ALL THEORETICAL CASES.SO THEY CANNOT BE OBJECTIVE EXCEPTIONS FOR THE DOGMA EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS IN 1965-2026. BUT THE CMRI IMPLIES THAT THESE ARE VISIBLE EXCEPTIONS FOR THE DOGMA EENS OF THE COUNCIL OF FLORENCE 1442, WHICH DID NOT MENTION ANY EXCEPTION
cmri.org/…nal-catholic-faith/baptism-of-blood-and…
From the teachings of the Popes, the Council of Trent, the 1917 Code of Canon Law, the Roman Martyrology,
the Fathers, Doctors and Theologians of the Church
1. COUNCIL OF TRENT (1545-1563)
Canons on the Sacraments in General (Canon 4):
“If anyone shall say that the sacraments of the New Law are not necessary for salvation, but are superfluous, and that although all are not necessary for every individual, without them or without the desire of them (sine eis aut eorum voto), through faith alone men obtain from God the grace of justiflcation …More
07.10.2026
VATICAN COUNCIL II SUPPORTS THE TRADITIONALISTS : IT IS ALIGNED WITH FR.LEONARD FEENEY AND THE ST. BENEDICT CENTER AND NOT THE POPES FROM PIUS XII TO LEO XIV WHO ARE CUSHINGITES
Vatican Council II supports the traditionalists. The Council was aligned with Fr. Leonard Feeney and the St. Benedict Center and not the Cushingism of Rahner, Ratzinger, Lefebvre, Lubac and others. Rahner was so bold as to eliminate the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus ( EENS) by projecting invisible cases of being saved in invincible ignorance ( LG 16) as being visible examples of salvation outside the Church and so practical exceptions for the dogma EENS. This was irrational and heretical. It was schismatic with the Magisterium and missionaries of the 16th century. It also changes the interpretation of the Nicene Creed and all the Catechisms. This is also the heresy today of the sedevacantists who are Cushingite (MHT, CMRI etc).
In his book, The Christian of the Future , Fr. Karl Rahner sj accepted …More
06.10.2026
JOINT STATEMENT COULD AFFIRM FEENEYITE MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS AND CALL FOR LIFTING OF CUSHINGITE EXCOMMUNICATIONS
The Society of St. Pius X and the St.Benedict Center in a joint statement could announce that they affirm all Magisterial Documents rationally. They call for the lifting of all Cushingite excommunications.
The SSPX, SBC, F.I, Fr. Claude Barthe’s Summorum Pontificum and the Ecclesia Dei communities can affirm all Magisterial Documents with Feeneyism and call for the lifting of all Cushingite excommunication.
A joint statement could support a Feeneyite Magisterium and the end of past sanctions and excommunications based upon Vatican Council II etc, Cushingite, which is irrational.
We have a theological breakthrough in the Catholic Church.
Church Documents and Vatican Council II interpreted rationally support the traditionalists. They are aligned with the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal at the Latin Mass.
The popes from Pius XII to Leo XIV were in schism with a …More
06.10.2026
Bishops Fellay and Galaratta were excommunicated twice with Vatican Council II irrational. They keep silent on VC 2 and EENS, rational, Feeneyite and traditional.
The SSPX bishops did not affirm Vatican Council II Feeneyite, extra ecclesiam nulla salus, Feeneyite, the baptism of desire, Feeneyite and the Nicene and Athanasius Creed, Feeneyite. Magisterial Documents, Feeneyite are in harmony with Tradition, Feeneyite.
Pope Paul VI and Pope Leo XIV used Vatican Council II Cushingite, to excommunicate Bishop Bernard Fellay and Bishop Alfonso de Gallarrata of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX).The SSPX bishops did not announce that Vatican Council II rational and Feeneyite and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, also rational and Feeneyite, supports the traditionalists and not the popes.
In the SSPX Declaration of Faith, Fr. Davide Pagliarani, the Superior General of the SSPX, interpreted the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus, the baptism of desire and Vatican Council II with …More
06.10.2026
JOINT STATEMENT COULD AFFIRM FEENEYITE MAGISTERIAL DOCUMENTS AND CALL FOR LIFTING OF CUSHINGITE EXCOMMUNICATIONS
The Society of St. Pius X and the St.Benedict Center in a joint statement could announce that they affirm all Magisterial Documents rationally and so Feeneyite. They call for the lifting of all Cushingite excommunications.
The SSPX, SBC, F.I, Fr. Claude Barthe’s Summorum Pontificum and the Ecclesia Dei communities can affirm all Magisterial Documents with Feeneyism and call for the lifting of all Cushingite excommunication.
A joint statement could support a Feeneyite Magisterium and the end of past sanctions and excommunications based upon Vatican Council II etc, Cushingite, which is irrational.
We have a theological breakthrough in the Catholic Church.
Church Documents and Vatican Council II interpreted rationally support the traditionalists. They are aligned with the ecclesiology of the Roman Missal at the Latin Mass.
The popes from Pius XII to Leo XIV were in …More
05.10.2026
VATICAN COUNCIL II SUPPORTS THE TRADITIONALISTS : POPE LEO XIV MAINTAINS THE SECRET
Pope Leo does not tell the traditionalists that Vatican Council II interpreted rationally supports them and not the liberals and the left. He hides this information. But even the Cushingite traditionalists at the Catholic Identify Conference kept it a secret for another year.
It is now discovered that we can interpret Vatican Council II rationally or irrationally, with Feeneyism or Cushingism and the conclusion will be orthodox or schismatic.
When what is invisible is seen as just being invisible, I call it Feeneyism. When what is invisible is mistaken as being visible, I call it Cushingism.
Cushingism is irrationally, heretical and schismatic but not only is Pope Leo, the cardinals and bishops Cushingite but also the SSPX, the Ecclesia Dei communities, the 30 organizations which form the Summorum Pontificum, the Fatima Center, Una Voce and the Catholic Identity Conference.
Bishop Athanasius …More
05.10.2026
Italian Ministry of Interior forces Catholic to deny the Faith
Matteo Piantedosi is the Minister of the Interior of Italy, whom the police follow. They treat you as a terrorist if you affirm the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus (EENS) in harmony with Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church interpreted rationally. With the rational interpretation LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc in Vatican Council II, refer to hypothetical and invisible cases in 1965-2026. So are not practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus which is aligned with Ad Gentes 7, Vatican Council II. Ad Gentes 7 is in the Catechism under the title Outside the Church No Salvation (846).
So the Italian Ministry of Interior and the Italian Government interprets LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, GS 22 etc, as known non Catholics saved outside the Church, without ‘faith and baptism’ (AG 7) in 1965-2026.So they become practical exceptions for the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus and …More
03.10.2026
ITALIAN MINISTRY OF INTERIOR INTERPRETS VATICAN COUNCIL II UNETHICALLY : GENERAL POLICY OF THE ITALIAN GOVERNMENT
I cannot be admitted in a pontifical university in Rome or have my Residence Permit. Propaganda Fide has stopped my study-stipend because of Vatican Council II rational.
The Italian Ministry of Interior, the Quirinale and the Vatican, still interpret Vatican Council II irrationally and not rationally.This is unethical. Since I interpret the Creeds, Councils and Catechisms rationally and not irrationally i.e not confusing what is implicit as being explicit, I am not allowed to enroll in a pontifical university in Rome and complete my studies in philosophy for a baccalaureate. Neither am I allowed to join a religious community.
The European Union and the Vatican interpret LG 8, 14, 16, UR 3, NA 2, Gs 22 etc in Vatican Council II dishonestly. I don’t.
Some 30 Catholic traditional organizations who participate in the Summorum Pontificum Mass of Bishop Athanasius …More
01.10.2026
CARDINALS BURKE, SARAH AND MULLER AND THE SSPX MUST ACCEPT VC2 LIKE THE ST. BENEDICT CENTER, NH: BREAKTHROUGH
Vatican Council II is now no more an issue for the sedevacantists. They can interpret the Council like the St. Benedict Center in New Hampshire, USA and accept it. It is in harmony with Tradition and no more liberal.
We do not have to interpret Vatican Council II any more like Cardinal Raymond Leo Burke and the SSPX. It is Cushingite.
Brother Andre Marie micm, Prior at the St. Benedict Center, NH, and the Slaves of the Immaculate Heart of Mary know that it is Pope Francis, Pope Leo and cardinals Fernandez, Roche and Cupich who create division in the Church, when they do not interpret and accept, Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church, rationally and not traditionally.
It is the irrational interpretation of Vatican Council II which produces division in the Church.
When the Diocese of Manchester in NH, for example. Interprets the Creeds, Councils …More
Governments of temporal powers and spiritual powers are collaborating to entrap humanity into being citizens of hell while on earth exclusively. Government and spiritual leaders who refuse to conform to this agenda are removed and replaced by complying leaders. The Roman Catholic Faith was established by Our Savior on earth for fallen humanity to have the means to become citizens of Heaven while on earth and so redeem mankind from the powers of hell. Vatican II was the culmination of this plot. This resulted in a false religion masquerading as Roman Catholic. The result is that those who are responsible for Vatican II and those who accept Vatican II have lost their citizenship of heaven. Traditional Catholics who totally adhere to the Roman Catholic Faith retain the means to be citizens of Heaven while on earth because of the Faith and the Sacraments.
30.09.2026
CONSERVATIVE PARTIES IN EUROPE MUST INTERPRET VATICAN COUNCIL II RATIONALLY ONLY : POPE LEO’S IRRATIONAL VERSION IS POLITICAL
When the AfD in Germany, Sinn Fein splinter groups in Ireland, Salvini and Vanucci in Italy and Marine le Pen’s RN in France announce that they will interpret Vatican Council II rationally and no more irrationally, honestly and not dishonestly, the Catholic Church becomes conservative once again, at least for them. They automatically oppose Pope Leo and the liberalism of the local archbishops. The Catholic Church returns to traditional faith and morals and opposes the political left.
At his last meeting in Milan, Matteo Salvini should have asked the Archbishop of Milan to affirm Vatican Council II rationally and not irrationally. Once the archbishop did this he would be able to speak at Salvini’s meetings on the non separation of Church and State, the need for traditional ecclesiocentric mission and evangelisation, Catholics must not vote for pro-abortion …More
29. 09.2025
WITH VATICAN COUNCIL II FEENEYITE POPE LEO WOULD BE ALIGNED WITH THE CONSERVATIVE PARTIES IN GERMANY AND ITALY
With Vatican Council II, Feeneyite and rational Pope Leo would have to be conservative and no more leftist. The Church returns to its traditional teachings on other religions and so comes close to the Afd in Germany and the victory of the new right in Calabria, Italy.
The liberal left Catholic Church in Germany does not allow Catholic members of the Afd to hold office in the Church. But if the Afd interpreted Vatican Council II and the Catechism of the Catholic Church rationally, they would be magisterial and apostolic and it would be the cardinals, bishops and the pope who would be outside the Church. Now it is only because Vatican Council II is Cushingite and so liberal and pro-Left, that traditional values are rejected by the Catholic Church hierarchy at the Vatican.
With Vatican Council II rational and Feeneyite, the Catholic Church once again becomes missionary …More
29.09.2026
CARDINAL BURKE MUST CHOOSE VATICAN COUNCIL II FEENEYITE : ALIGN WITH THE ST.BENEDICT CENTER, NH ON VC2
The interpretation of Vatican Council II by the diocese of Manchester in New Hampshire, USA, where the traditionalist St. Benedict Center is located, is Cushingite like that of Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernandez and the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, Vatican.
Legally, the diocese and the Vatican are not allowed to confuse what is implicit as being explicit and then coerce all the religious communities and the laity in the idiocies to do the same. With the threat of practical sanctions.
The Mayor in New Hampshire must in principle is not allowed to confuse what is invisible as being visible, and consider this normal and the reality among the population.
The religious communities which interpret Church documents only irrationally are approved by Bishop Peter Libasci the bishop of Manchester in NH. This is unethical by secular standards.
Catholic organisations have to …More